From datasheet PDF to reviewable symbol and footprint.
Circuitly reads the datasheet and your library conventions, then generates the part as native library files your librarian approves — instead of an engineer transcribing pin tables.
Use cases
Review schematics and layout in full context. Create library parts from datasheets. Keep the approved library consistent, design bounded circuit blocks, and watch the BOM. Every workflow defines its inputs, its output, and the decision an engineer keeps.
Connected review
A Circuitly review spans schematic and layout together, and runs against everything the change touches: the firmware that drives the pins, the requirements the rail must hold, MCAD outline and keep-outs, the datasheets, the revision history, and your own engineering standards. Findings arrive with evidence attached — and wait for an engineer to approve them.
Explore AI schematic reviewFour more capabilities
Review is where most teams start. The library, the BOM, and the bounded design block run through the same connected context and the same rule: Circuitly prepares the work, an engineer approves it.
Circuitly reads the datasheet and your library conventions, then generates the part as native library files your librarian approves — instead of an engineer transcribing pin tables.
Duplicates, footprint drift, stale datasheets, and post-approval EOL surface as an audit with proposed fixes — and the library owner decides what changes.
Delegate the bounded, mid-complexity block — grounded in your library and the datasheets, with assumptions written down — and keep the architecture yours.
The BOM is monitored between revisions, and every candidate substitution is scored against the circuit it serves, trade-offs stated, for an engineer to approve.
Scenario library
Each scenario defines the inputs, the engineering output, and the human decision point.
Review and understand
Understand architecture, inspect requirements coverage, surface potential issues, and resolve open questions.
Reconstruct design intent and dependencies before changing an inherited or under-documented design.
Compare delivered work against requirements, standards, interfaces, and the agreed design boundary.
Review, connected
Review each diff and release candidate with full context before it ships.
Know which requirements the design satisfies — and which nobody has covered.
Catch EOL parts, stock cliffs, and single-source exposure during review.
Your Markdown checklists and standards, applied on every review.
Share and prepare
Prepare architecture, interfaces, known constraints, decisions, and open questions for layout, firmware, sourcing, manufacturing, or a new owner.
Give a new contributor a grounded path through the design instead of a folder dump and tribal knowledge.
Resolve layout-sensitive assumptions, constraints, interfaces, and missing context before they become board rework.
Translate the design record into expected rails, interfaces, test points, sequencing, and investigation paths.
We’ll help identify a bounded use case where your team can learn quickly without weakening engineering control.
Talk to us about your AI strategy